Paper detail

Chain breaking in the statistical mechanical constitutive theory of polymer networks

Elastomers are used in a wide range of applications because of their large strain to failure, low density, and tailorable stiffness and toughness. The mechanical behavior of elastomers derives mainly from the entropic elasticity of the underlying network of polymer chains. Elastomers under large deformation experience bonds breaking within the polymer network. This breaking of chains damages the network, can lead to material failure, and can be utilized as an energy dissipation mechanism. In the case of reversible bonds, broken chains may reform and heal the damage in the network. If the reversible bonds are dynamic, chains constantly break and reform and create a transient network. A fundamental constitutive theory is developed to model the mechanics of these polymer networks. A statistical mechanical derivation is conducted to yield a framework that takes in an arbitrary single-chain model (a Hamiltonian) and outputs: the single-chain mechanical response, the breaking and reforming kinetics, the equilibrium distribution of chains in the network, and the partial differential equations governing the deformation-coupled network evolution. This statistical mechanical framework is then brought into the continuum scale by using macroscopic thermodynamic constitutive theory to obtain a constitutive relation for the Cauchy stress. The potential-supplemented freely jointed chain ($u$FJC) model is introduced, and a parametric study of its mechanical response and breaking kinetics is provided. This single-chain model is then implemented within the constitutive framework, which we specialize and apply in two exemplary cases: the mechanical response and irreversible breakdown of a multinetwork elastomer, and the mechanical response of a dual crosslink gel. After providing a parametric study of the general constitutive model, we apply it to a hydrogel with reversible metal-coordination crosslinks.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.