Paper detail

CFL: Cluster Federated Learning in Large-scale Peer-to-Peer Networks

Federated learning (FL) has sparked extensive interest in exploiting the private data on clients' local devices. However, the parameter server setting of FL not only has high bandwidth requirements, but also poses data privacy issues and a single point of failure. In this paper, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving protocol, dubbed CFL, which is the first fine-grained global model training for FL in large-scale peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. Unlike previous FL in P2P networks, CFL aggregates local model update parameters hierarchically, which improves the communication efficiency facing large amounts of clients. Also, the aggregation in CFL is performed in a secure manner by introducing the authenticated encryption scheme, whose key is established through a random pairwise key scheme enhanced by a proposed voting-based key revocation mechanism. Rigorous analyses show that CFL guarantees the privacy and data integrity and authenticity of local model update parameters under two widespread threat models. More importantly, the proposed key revocation mechanism can effectively resist hijack attacks, thereby ensuring the confidentiality of the communication keys. Ingenious experiments on the Trec06p and Trec07 datasets show that the global model trained by CFL has good classification accuracy, model generalization, and rapid convergence rate, and the dropout-robustness of the system is achieved. Compared to the first global model training protocol for FL in P2P networks, PPT, CFL improves communication efficiency by 43.25%. Also, CFL outperforms PPT in terms of computational efficiency.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.