Paper detail

Cervical Optical Coherence Tomography Image Classification Based on Contrastive Self-Supervised Texture Learning

Background: Cervical cancer seriously affects the health of the female reproductive system. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) emerged as a non-invasive, high-resolution imaging technology for cervical disease detection. However, OCT image annotation is knowledge-intensive and time-consuming, which impedes the training process of deep-learning-based classification models. Purpose: This study aims to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) approach to classifying in-vivo cervical OCT images based on self-supervised learning. Methods: In addition to high-level semantic features extracted by a convolutional neural network (CNN), the proposed CADx approach leverages unlabeled cervical OCT images' texture features learned by contrastive texture learning. We conducted ten-fold cross-validation on the OCT image dataset from a multi-center clinical study on 733 patients from China. Results: In a binary classification task for detecting high-risk diseases, including high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and cervical cancer, our method achieved an area-under-the-curve value of 0.9798 plus or minus 0.0157 with a sensitivity of 91.17 plus or minus 4.99% and a specificity of 93.96 plus or minus 4.72% for OCT image patches; also, it outperformed two out of four medical experts on the test set. Furthermore, our method achieved a 91.53% sensitivity and 97.37% specificity on an external validation dataset containing 287 3D OCT volumes from 118 Chinese patients in a new hospital using a cross-shaped threshold voting strategy. Conclusions: The proposed contrastive-learning-based CADx method outperformed the end-to-end CNN models and provided better interpretability based on texture features, which holds great potential to be used in the clinical protocol of "see-and-treat."

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.