Paper detail

Centrality fluctuations and decorrelations in heavy-ion collisions

The centrality or the number of initial-state sources $V$ of the system produced in heavy ion collision is a concept that is not uniquely defined and subject to significant theoretical and experimental uncertainties. We argue that a more robust connection between the initial-state sources with final-state multiplicity could be established from the event-by-event multiplicity correlation between two subevents separated in pseudorapidity, $N_a$ vs $N_b$. This correlation is sensitive to two main types of centrality fluctuations (CF): 1) particle production for each source $p(n)$ which smears the relation between $V$ and $N_a$ used for experimental centrality, and 2) decorrelations between the sources in the two subevents $V_b$ and $V_a$. The CF is analyzed in terms of cumulants of $V_b$ and $N_b$ as a function of $N_a$, i.e. experimental centrality is defined with $N_a$. We found that the mean values $\langle V_b\rangle_{N_a}$ and $\langle N_b\rangle_{N_a}$ increase linearly with $N_a$ in mid-central collisions, but flatten out in ultra-central collisions. Such non-linear behavior is sensitive to the centrality resolution of $N_a$. In the presence of centrality decorrelations, the scaled variances $\langle(δV_b)^2\rangle/\langle V_b\rangle$ and $\langle(δN_b)^2\rangle/\langle N_b\rangle$ are found to decrease linearly with $N_a$ in mid-central collisions, while the $p(n)$ leads to another sharp decrease in the ultra-central region. The higher-order cumulants of $V_b$ and $N_b$ show interesting but rather complex behaviors which deserve further studies. Our results suggest that one can use the cumulants of the two-dimensional multiplicity correlation, especially the mean and variance, to constrain the particle production mechanism as well as the longitudinal fluctuations of the initial-state sources.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.