Paper detail

Centrality-dependent chemical potentials of light hadrons and quarks based on transverse momentum spectra and particle yield ratios in Au-Au collisions

We describe the transverse momentum spectra of $π^\pm$, $K^\pm$, $p$, and $\bar{p}$ produced in different centralities gold-gold (Au-Au) collisions at different collision energies range from 7.7 to 62.4 GeV by a two-component Erlang distribution. The fitting results are consistent with the experimental data, and the centrality- and energy-dependent yield ratios of negative to positive particles are obtained from the normalization constants. Based on the yield ratios, the energy- and centrality-dependent chemical potentials of light hadrons and quarks are extracted. The study shows that the dependences of the three types of particle yield ratios on centrality are not significant, especially for $π$. The logarithms of the three yield ratios show obvious linear dependence on $1/\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ over a range from 7.7 to 62.4 GeV. The extracted chemical potentials show obvious dependence on energy, and decrease with the increase of energy. The dependences of the energy-dependent chemical potentials of light hadrons and quarks on centrality are relatively more obvious in low energy region. The derived curves of chemical potentials for all centralities, from the linear fits of the logarithms of yield ratios vs energy, have the extremum at the same energy of 3.526 GeV, which possibly is the critical energy of phase transition from a liquid-like hadron state to a gas-like quark state in the collision system. With the increase of energy, all types of chemical potentials become small and tend to zero at very high energy, which indicates that with the increase of energy, the hadronic interactions gradually fade and the partonic interactions gradually become greater.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.