Paper detail

Center-Outward Distribution Functions, Quantiles, Ranks, and Signs in $\mathbb{R}^d$

Univariate concepts as quantile and distribution functions involving ranks and signs, do not canonically extend to $\mathbb{R}^d, d\geq 2$. Palliating that has generated an abundant literature. Chapter 1 shows that, unlike the many definitions that have been proposed so far, the measure transportation-based ones introduced in Chernozhukov et al. (2017) enjoy all the properties that make univariate quantiles and ranks successful tools for semiparametric statistical inference. We therefore propose a new center-outward definition of multivariate distribution and quantile functions, along with their empirical counterparts, for which we obtain a Glivenko-Cantelli result. Our approach is geometric and, contrary to the Monge-Kantorovich one in Chernozhukov et al. (2017), does not require any moment assumptions. The resulting ranks and signs are strictly distribution-free, and maximal invariant under the action of a data-driven class of (order-preserving) transformations generating the family of absolutely continuous distributions; that property is the theoretical foundation of the semiparametric efficiency preservation property of ranks. The corresponding quantiles are equivariant under the same transformations. The empirical proposed distribution functions are defined at observed values only. A continuous extension to the entire $\mathbb{R}^d$, yielding continuous empirical quantile contours while preserving the monotonicity and Glivenko-Cantelli features is desirable. Such extension requires solving a nontrivial problem of smooth interpolation under cyclical monotonicity constraints. A complete solution of that problem is given in Chapter 2; we show that the resulting distribution and quantile functions are Lipschitz, and provide a sharp lower bound for the Lipschitz constants. A numerical study of empirical center-outward quantile contours and their consistency is conducted.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.