Paper detail

Censored Regression with Serially Correlated Errors: a Bayesian approach

The problem of estimating censored linear regression models with autocorrelated errors arises in many environmental and social studies. The present work proposes a Bayesian approach to estimate censored regression models with AR(p) errors. The algorithm developed here considers the Gibbs sampler with data augmentation(GDA), in which, at each iteration, both the model parameters and the latent variables are sampled. The data augmentation is achieved from multiple sampling of the latent variables from the corresponding conditional distributions. A suitable variable transformation allows the full likelihood to be obtained. A simulation study indicates that the proposed approach produces estimates with a high accuracy even in scenarios where the proportion of censored observations is large. The method is further illustrated in a real data of cloud ceiling height, including model checking and selection for censored time series data.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.