Paper detail

CCL4Rec: Contrast over Contrastive Learning for Micro-video Recommendation

Micro-video recommender systems suffer from the ubiquitous noises in users' behaviors, which might render the learned user representation indiscriminating, and lead to trivial recommendations (e.g., popular items) or even weird ones that are far beyond users' interests. Contrastive learning is an emergent technique for learning discriminating representations with random data augmentations. However, due to neglecting the noises in user behaviors and treating all augmented samples equally, the existing contrastive learning framework is insufficient for learning discriminating user representations in recommendation. To bridge this research gap, we propose the Contrast over Contrastive Learning framework for training recommender models, named CCL4Rec, which models the nuances of different augmented views by further contrasting augmented positives/negatives with adaptive pulling/pushing strengths, i.e., the contrast over (vanilla) contrastive learning. To accommodate these contrasts, we devise the hardness-aware augmentations that track the importance of behaviors being replaced in the query user and the relatedness of substitutes, and thus determining the quality of augmented positives/negatives. The hardness-aware augmentation also permits controllable contrastive learning, leading to performance gains and robust training. In this way, CCL4Rec captures the nuances of historical behaviors for a given user, which explicitly shields off the learned user representation from the effects of noisy behaviors. We conduct extensive experiments on two micro-video recommendation benchmarks, which demonstrate that CCL4Rec with far less model parameters could achieve comparable performance to existing state-of-the-art method, and improve the training/inference speed by several orders of magnitude.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.