Paper detail

Categorification of Wedderburn's basis for \mathbb{C}[S_n]

M. Neunh{ö}ffer studies in \cite{Ne} a certain basis of $\mathbb{C}[S_n]$ with the origins in \cite{Lu} and shows that this basis is in fact Wedderburn's basis. In particular, in this basis the right regular representation of $S_n$ decomposes into a direct sum of irreducible representations (i.e. Specht or cell modules). In the present paper we rediscover essentially the same basis with a categorical origin coming from projective-injective modules in certain subcategories of the BGG-category $\mathcal{O}$. An important role in our arguments is played by the dominant projective module in each of these categories. As a biproduct of the study of this dominant projective module we show that {\it Kostant's problem} (\cite{Jo}) has a negative answer for some simple highest weight module over the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}_4$, which disproves the general belief that Kostant's problem should have a positive answer for all simple highest weight modules in type $A$.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.