Paper detail

Cascading Failures in Smart Grids under Random, Targeted and Adaptive Attacks

We study cascading failures in smart grids, where an attacker selectively compromises the nodes with probabilities proportional to their degrees, betweenness, or clustering coefficient. This implies that nodes with high degrees, betweenness, or clustering coefficients are attacked with higher probability. We mathematically and experimentally analyze the sizes of the giant components of the networks under different types of targeted attacks, and compare the results with the corresponding sizes under random attacks. We show that networks disintegrate faster for targeted attacks compared to random attacks. A targeted attack on a small fraction of high degree nodes disintegrates one or both of the networks, whereas both the networks contain giant components for random attack on the same fraction of nodes. An important observation is that an attacker has an advantage if it compromises nodes based on their betweenness, rather than based on degree or clustering coefficient. We next study adaptive attacks, where an attacker compromises nodes in rounds. Here, some nodes are compromised in each round based on their degree, betweenness or clustering coefficients, instead of compromising all nodes together. In this case, the degree, betweenness, or clustering coefficient is calculated before the start of each round, instead of at the beginning. We show experimentally that an adversary has an advantage in this adaptive approach, compared to compromising the same number of nodes all at once.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.