Paper detail

Cascade Appearance Signatures of Sterile Neutrinos at 1-100 TeV

Neutrino telescopes provide strong sensitivity to sterile neutrino oscillations through matter-enhanced oscillation, occurring in the few TeV energy range for eV$^{2}$-scale neutrino mass-squared splittings. Prior searches have focused on $ν_μ$ disappearance, which has a particularly strong sensitivity to the mixing angle $θ_{24}$ via $ν_μ\rightarrowν_s$ transitions. Nowadays, the $ν_μ\rightarrowν_e$ and $ν_μ\rightarrowν_τ$ appearance channels have been considered less promising at neutrino telescopes, due in part to the much smaller target volume for cascades relative to tracks. This work explores the detectability of these signatures at neutrino telescopes given present constraints on sterile neutrino mixing, and as an example, forecasts the sensitivity of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory to the mixing angles $θ_{14}$, $θ_{24}$, and $θ_{34}$ in the 3+1 sterile neutrino model using the cascade channel with ten years of data. We find that $ν_τ$ appearance signatures consistent with the existing IceCube $ν_μ$ disappearance best-fit point are discoverable for values of $θ_{34}$ consistent with world constraints, and that the sterile neutrino parameters favored by the BEST and gallium anomalies are expected to be testable at the 95\% confidence level.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.