Paper detail

CaRTS: Causality-driven Robot Tool Segmentation from Vision and Kinematics Data

Vision-based segmentation of the robotic tool during robot-assisted surgery enables downstream applications, such as augmented reality feedback, while allowing for inaccuracies in robot kinematics. With the introduction of deep learning, many methods were presented to solve instrument segmentation directly and solely from images. While these approaches made remarkable progress on benchmark datasets, fundamental challenges pertaining to their robustness remain. We present CaRTS, a causality-driven robot tool segmentation algorithm, that is designed based on a complementary causal model of the robot tool segmentation task. Rather than directly inferring segmentation masks from observed images, CaRTS iteratively aligns tool models with image observations by updating the initially incorrect robot kinematic parameters through forward kinematics and differentiable rendering to optimize image feature similarity end-to-end. We benchmark CaRTS with competing techniques on both synthetic as well as real data from the dVRK, generated in precisely controlled scenarios to allow for counterfactual synthesis. On training-domain test data, CaRTS achieves a Dice score of 93.4 that is preserved well (Dice score of 91.8) when tested on counterfactually altered test data, exhibiting low brightness, smoke, blood, and altered background patterns. This compares favorably to Dice scores of 95.0 and 86.7, respectively, of the SOTA image-based method. Future work will involve accelerating CaRTS to achieve video framerate and estimating the impact occlusion has in practice. Despite these limitations, our results are promising: In addition to achieving high segmentation accuracy, CaRTS provides estimates of the true robot kinematics, which may benefit applications such as force estimation. Code is available at: https://github.com/hding2455/CaRTS

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.