Paper detail

Cardiovascular risk and work stress in biomedical researchers in China: An observational, big data study protocol

Introduction: Internet technologies could strengthen data collection and integration and have been used extensively in public health research. It is necessary to apply this technology to further investigate the behaviour and health of biomedical researchers. A browser-based extension was developed by researchers and clinicians to promote the collection and analysis of researchers' behavioural and psychological data. This protocol illustrates an observational study aimed at (1) characterising the health status of biomedical researchers in China and assessing work stress, job satisfaction, role conflict, role ambiguity, and family support; (2) identifying the association between work, behaviour, and health; and (3) investigating the association between behaviour and mental status. Our findings will contribute to the understanding of the influences of job, work environment, and family support on the mental and physical health of biomedical researchers. Methods and analysis: This is a prospective observational study; all candidates will be recruited from China. Participants will install an extension on their Internet browsers, which will collect data when they are accessing PubMed. A web-based survey will be sent to the user interfaces every 6 months that will involve sociodemographic variables, perceived stress scale, job satisfaction scale, role conflict and ambiguity scale, and family support scale. Machine-learning algorithms will analyse the data generated during daily access. Ethics and dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the ethics committee of the Shanghai Children's Medical Centre (reference number SCMCIRB-K2018082). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.