Paper detail

Carbon $^{14}$C and Tritium as possible background sources in XENON1T

In this work, carbon $^{14}$C and Tritium were considered as possible background source in the XENON1T experiment. The simulation results show that if $^{14}$C is located in dust particles with a characteristic size of tens of micrometers, then its beta spectrum is softened and can contribute to the low-background part of the spectrum (up to 20 keV) of the XENON1T experiment. In addition, it has been shown that the tritium spectrum is also significantly distorted due to the threshold effect and the form in which tritium is living in xenon. Comparison of the simulation results with experimental data allowed us to estimate the activity level of $^{14}$C at about 1500 decays / t / year, which gives the level of organic impurities containing $^{14}$C at the level of 2x10$^{-13}$ g/g. In the case of tritium background, spectrum distortions are already caused by nanoparticles. Wherein the shape of the spectrum from tritium sitting on the surface of the dust fits better into the experimental data than the spectrum from pure tritium. In addition, since the dust absorbs part of the decays, the total amount of tritium in xenon can be several times greater than assuming a background from pure tritium in xenon (the factor strongly depends on the size of the dust particles).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.