Paper detail

Capture numbers and islands size distributions in models of submonolayer surface growth

The capture numbers entering the rate equations (RE) for submonolayer film growth are determined from extensive kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations for simple representative growth models yielding point, compact, and fractal island morphologies. The full dependence of the capture numbers on island size, and on both the coverage and the D/F ratio between the adatom diffusion coefficient D and deposition rate F is determined. Based on this information, the RE are solved to give the RE island size distribution (RE-ISD). The RE-ISDs are shown to agree well with the corresponding KMC-ISDs for all island morphologies. For compact morphologies, however, this agreement is only present for coverages smaller than about 5% due to a significantly increased coalescence rate compared to fractal morphologies. As found earlier, the scaled KMC-ISDs as a function of scaled island size approach, for fixed coverage, a limiting curve for D/F going to infinity. Our findings provide evidence that the limiting curve is independent of the coverage for point islands, while the results for compact and fractal island morphologies indicate a dependence on the coverage.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.