Paper detail

Canonical Paths for MCMC: from Art to Science

Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is a widely used algorithm design scheme with many applications. To make efficient use of this method, the key step is to prove that the Markov chain is rapid mixing. Canonical paths is one of the two main tools to prove rapid mixing. However, there are much fewer success examples comparing to coupling, the other main tool. The main reason is that there is no systematic approach or general recipe to design canonical paths. Building up on a previous exploration by McQuillan, we develop a general theory to design canonical paths for MCMC: We reduce the task of designing canonical paths to solving a set of linear equations, which can be automatically done even by a machine. Making use of this general approach, we obtain fully polynomial-time randomized approximation schemes (FPRAS) for counting the number of $b$-matching with $b\leq 7$ and $b$-edge-cover with $b\leq 2$. They are natural generalizations of matchings and edge covers for graphs. No polynomial time approximation was previously known for these problems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.