Paper detail

Canonical Hexagons and the PSL(2,C) Discreteness Problem

The discreteness problem, that is, the problem of determining whether or not a given finitely generated group G of orientation preserving isometries of hyperbolic three-space is discrete as a subgroup of the whole isometry group of hyperbolic three space, is a challenging problem that has been investigated for more than a century and is still open. It is known that G is discrete if, and only if, every non-elementary two generator subgroup is. Several sufficient conditions for discreteness are also known as are some necessary conditions, though no single necessary and sufficient condition is known. There is a finite discreteness algorithm for the two generator subgroups of the isometry group of hyperbolic two-space. But the situation in three dimensions is more delicate because there are geometrically infinite groups. We present a semi-algorithm, that is, a procedure that terminates sometimes but not always. There is no standard way to find an infinite sequence of distinct elements that converges to the identity to show that a group is not discrete. Our semi-algorithm either produces such an infinite sequence or finds a finite sequence that produces a right angled hexagon in hyperbolic three-space which has a special property that is a generalization of the notion of convexity. We call it a canonical hexagon. If the group is discrete, free and geometrically finite, it always has an essentially unique canonical hexagon which the procedure finds in a finite number of steps.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.