Paper detail

Can We Detect the Color-Density Relation with Photometric Redshifts?

A variety of methods have been proposed to define and to quantify galaxy environments. While these techniques work well in general with spectroscopic redshift samples, their application to photometric redshift surveys remains uncertain. To investigate whether galaxy environments can be robustly measured with photo-z samples, we quantify how the density measured with the nearest neighbor approach is affected by photo-z uncertainties by using the Durham mock galaxy catalogs in which the 3D real-space environments and the properties of galaxies are exactly known. Furthermore, we present an optimization scheme in the choice of parameters used in the 2D projected measurements which yield the tightest correlation with respect to the 3D real-space environments. By adopting the optimized parameters in the density measurements, we show that the correlation between the 2D projected optimized density and real-space density can still be revealed, and the color-density relation is also visible out to $z \sim 0.8$ even for a photo-z uncertainty ($σ_{Δ_{z}/(1+z)}$) up to 0.06. We find that at the redshift $0.3 < z < 0.5$ a deep ($i \sim 25$) photometric redshift survey with $σ_{Δ_{z}/(1+z)} = 0.02$ yields a comparable performance of small-scale density measurement to a shallower $i \sim$ 22.5 spectroscopic sample with $\sim$ 10% sampling rate. Finally, we discuss the application of the local density measurements to the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep survey, one of the largest deep optical imaging surveys. Using data from $\sim5$ square degrees of survey area, our results show that it is possible to measure local density and to probe the color-density relation with 3$σ$ confidence level out to $z \sim 0.8$ in the PS-MDS. The color-density relation, however, quickly degrades for data covering smaller areas.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.