Researcher profile

Carlton Baugh

Carlton Baugh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Multi-wavelength consensus of large-scale linear bias

We model the large-scale linear galaxy bias $b_g(x,z)$ as a function of redshift $z$ and observed absolute magnitude threshold $x$ for broadband continuum emission from the far infrared to ultra-violet, as well as for prominent emission lines, such as the H$α$, H$β$, Lya and [OII] lines. The modelling relies on the semi-analytic galaxy formation model GALFORM, run on the state-of-the-art $N$-body simulation SURFS with the Planck 2015 cosmology. We find that both the differential bias at observed absolute magnitude $x$ and the cumulative bias for magnitudes brighter than $x$ can be fitted with a five-parameter model: $b_g(x,z)=a + b(1+z)^e(1 + \exp{[(x-c)d]})$. We also find that the bias for the continuum bands follows a very similar form regardless of wavelength due to the mixing of star-forming and quiescent galaxies in a magnitude limited survey. Differences in bias only become apparent when an additional colour separation is included, which suggest extensions to this work could look at different colours at fixed magnitude limits. We test our fitting formula against observations, finding reasonable agreement with some measurements within $1σ$ statistical uncertainties, and highlighting areas of improvement. We provide the fitting parameters for various continuum bands, emission lines and intrinsic galaxy properties, enabling a quick estimation of the linear bias in any typical survey of large-scale structure.

preprint2013arXiv

Probability Friends-of-Friends (PFOF) Group Finder: Performance Study and Observational Data Applications on Photometric Surveys

(Abridged) In tandem with observational datasets, we utilize realistic mock catalogs, based on a semi-analytic galaxy formation model, constructed specifically for Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Surveys in order to assess the performance of the Probability Friends-of-Friends (PFOF, Liu et al.) group finder, and aim to develop a grouping optimization method applicable to surveys like Pan-STARRS1. Producing mock PFOF group catalogs under a variety of photometric redshift accuracies (σΔz/(1+zs)), we find that catalog purities and completenesses from ``good' σΔz/(1+zs)) ~ 0.01) to ``poor' σΔz/(1+zs)) ~ 0.07) photo-zs gradually degrade respectively from 77% and 70% to 52% and 47%. To avoid model dependency of the mock for use on observational data we apply a ``subset optimization' approach, using spectroscopic-redshift group data from the target field to train the group finder for application to that field, as an alternative method for the grouping optimization. We demonstrate this approach using these spectroscopically identified groups as the training set, i.e. zCOSMOS groups for PFOF searches within PS1 Medium Deep Field04 (PS1MD04) and DEEP2 EGS groups for searches in PS1MD07. We ultimately apply PFOF to four datasets spanning the photo-z uncertainty range from 0.01 to 0.06 in order to quantify the dependence of group recovery performance on photo-z accuracy. We find purities and completenesses calculated from observational datasets broadly agree with their mock analogues. Further tests of the PFOF algorithm are performed via matches to X-ray clusters identified within the PS1MD04 and COSMOS footprints. Across over a decade in group mass, we find PFOF groups match ~85% of X-ray clusters in COSMOS and PS1MD04, but at a lower statistical significance in the latter.