Paper detail

Can substructure in the Galactic Halo explain the ATIC and PAMELA results?

Recently, ATIC and PAMELA measured an anomalously large flux of leptonic cosmic rays which may arise from dark matter self-annihilation. While the annihilation signal predicted for a smooth halo is 10^2-10^3 times smaller than the measured excess, the signal can be boosted by the presence of subhalos. We investigate the feasibility of large boost factors using a new Monte Carlo calculation technique that is constrained by previous simulation work on halo substructure. The model accounts for the observed decrease in the amount of substructure with decreasing halo mass and the scatter in halo structural parameters such as the density concentration parameter. Our results suggest that boost factors of the order of 10^2 are ruled out at more than 14 sigma. We conclude that substructure alone, at least with commonly assumed annihilation cross-sections, cannot explain the anomalous flux measured by ATIC and PAMELA.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.