Researcher profile

L. M. Widrow

L. M. Widrow contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Galaxy Masses

Galaxy masses play a fundamental role in our understanding of structure formation models. This review addresses the variety and reliability of mass estimators that pertain to stars, gas, and dark matter. The different sections on masses from stellar populations, dynamical masses of gas-rich and gas-poor galaxies, with some attention paid to our Milky Way, and masses from weak and strong lensing methods, all provide review material on galaxy masses in a self-consistent manner.

preprint2009arXiv

Can substructure in the Galactic Halo explain the ATIC and PAMELA results?

Recently, ATIC and PAMELA measured an anomalously large flux of leptonic cosmic rays which may arise from dark matter self-annihilation. While the annihilation signal predicted for a smooth halo is 10^2-10^3 times smaller than the measured excess, the signal can be boosted by the presence of subhalos. We investigate the feasibility of large boost factors using a new Monte Carlo calculation technique that is constrained by previous simulation work on halo substructure. The model accounts for the observed decrease in the amount of substructure with decreasing halo mass and the scatter in halo structural parameters such as the density concentration parameter. Our results suggest that boost factors of the order of 10^2 are ruled out at more than 14 sigma. We conclude that substructure alone, at least with commonly assumed annihilation cross-sections, cannot explain the anomalous flux measured by ATIC and PAMELA.