Source author record

L. M. Widrow

L. M. Widrow appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Galaxy Masses

Galaxy masses play a fundamental role in our understanding of structure formation models. This review addresses the variety and reliability of mass estimators that pertain to stars, gas, and dark matter. The different sections on masses from stellar populations, dynamical masses of gas-rich and gas-poor galaxies, with some attention paid to our Milky Way, and masses from weak and strong lensing methods, all provide review material on galaxy masses in a self-consistent manner.

preprint2009arXiv

Can substructure in the Galactic Halo explain the ATIC and PAMELA results?

Recently, ATIC and PAMELA measured an anomalously large flux of leptonic cosmic rays which may arise from dark matter self-annihilation. While the annihilation signal predicted for a smooth halo is 10^2-10^3 times smaller than the measured excess, the signal can be boosted by the presence of subhalos. We investigate the feasibility of large boost factors using a new Monte Carlo calculation technique that is constrained by previous simulation work on halo substructure. The model accounts for the observed decrease in the amount of substructure with decreasing halo mass and the scatter in halo structural parameters such as the density concentration parameter. Our results suggest that boost factors of the order of 10^2 are ruled out at more than 14 sigma. We conclude that substructure alone, at least with commonly assumed annihilation cross-sections, cannot explain the anomalous flux measured by ATIC and PAMELA.