Paper detail

Can NetGAN be improved on short random walks?

Graphs are useful structures that can model several important real-world problems. Recently, learning graphs have drawn considerable attention, leading to the proposal of new methods for learning these data structures. One of these studies produced NetGAN, a new approach for generating graphs via random walks. Although NetGAN has shown promising results in terms of accuracy in the tasks of generating graphs and link prediction, the choice of vertices from which it starts random walks can lead to inconsistent and highly variable results, especially when the length of walks is short. As an alternative to random starting, this study aims to establish a new method for initializing random walks from a set of dense vertices. We purpose estimating the importance of a node based on the inverse of its influence over the whole vertices of its neighborhood through random walks of different sizes. The proposed method manages to achieve significantly better accuracy, less variance and lesser outliers.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.