Paper detail

Can High-Temperature Reactions Be Described by a Minimum Energy Path Model? Steric Hindrance Matters

High-temperature reactions widely exist in nature. However, they are difficult to be characterized either experimentally or computationally. The routinely used minimum energy path (MEP) model in computational modeling of chemical reactions is not justified to describe high-temperature reactions since high-energy structures are actively involved there. In this study, using CH4 decomposition on the Cu(111) surface as an example, we systematically compare MEP results with those obtained by explicitly sampling all relevant structures via ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations at different temperatures. Interestingly, we find that, for reactions protected by a strong steric hindrance effect, the MEP is still effectively followed even at a temperature close to the Cu melting point. In contrast, without such a protection, the flexibility of surface Cu atoms can lead to a significant free energy barrier reduction at a high temperature. Accordingly, some conclusions about graphene growth mechanisms based on MEP calculations should be revisited. Physical insights provided by this study can deepen our understanding on high-temperature surface reactions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.