Paper detail

Call for establishing benchmark science and engineering

Currently, there is no consistent benchmarking across multi-disciplines. Even no previous work tries to relate different categories of benchmarks in multi-disciplines. This article investigates the origin and evolution of the benchmark term. Five categories of benchmarks are summarized, including measurement standards, standardized data sets with defined properties, representative workloads, representative data sets, and best practices, which widely exist in multi-disciplines. I believe there are two pressing challenges in growing this discipline: establishing consistent benchmarking across multi-disciplines and developing meta-benchmark to measure the benchmarks themselves. I propose establishing benchmark science and engineering; one of the primary goals is to set up a standard benchmark hierarchy across multi-disciplines. It is the right time to launch a multi-disciplinary benchmark, standard, and evaluation journal, TBench, to communicate the state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice of benchmark science and engineering.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.