Paper detail

CaLi2 superconductor under the pressure of 100 GPa: the thermodynamic critical field and the specific heat

In the paper, the thermodynamic properties of the CaLi$_2$ superconductor have been studied. It has been assumed the high value of the pressure: $p=100$ GPa. The thermodynamic critical field ($H_{C}$) and the specific heats for the superconducting and normal state ($C^{S}$ and $C^{N}$) have been obtained. The calculations have been made within the framework of the Eliashberg approach for the wide range of the Coulomb pseudopotential: $μ^{\star}\in<0.1,0.3>$. It has been shown that the low-temperature critical field and the specific heat jump at $T_{C}$ strongly decrease if $μ^{\star}$ increases. The value of the dimensionless ratio $R_{C}\equiv(C^{S}-C^{N})/C^{N}$ at the critical temperature differs significantly from the value predicted by the BCS model. In particular, the parameter $R_{C}$ decreases from 1.83 to 1.73 with the increase of the Coulomb pseudopotential value. In the paper, the interpolation formulas for the functions $T_{C}(μ^{\star})$ and $R_{C}(μ^{\star})$ have been also given.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.