Paper detail

Calculation of electron-ion temperature equilibration rates and friction coefficients in plasmas and liquid metals using quantum molecular dynamics

We discuss a method to calculate with quantum molecular dynamics simulations the rate of energy exchanges between electrons and ions in two-temperature plasmas, liquid metals and hot solids. Promising results from this method were recently reported for various materials and physical conditions [J. Simoni and J. Daligault, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 205001 (2019)]. Like other ab-initio calculations, the approach offers a very useful comparison with the experimental measurements and permits an extension into conditions not covered by the experiments. The energy relaxation rate is related to the friction coefficients felt by individual ions due to their non-adiabatic interactions with electrons. Each coefficient satisfies a Kubo relation given by the time integral of the autocorrelation function of the interaction force between an ion and the electrons. These Kubo relations are evaluated using the output of quantum molecular dynamics calculations in which electrons are treated in the framework of finite-temperature density functional theory. The calculation presents difficulties that are unlike those encountered with the Kubo formulas for the electrical and thermal conductivities. In particular, the widely used Kubo-Greenwood approximation is inapplicable here. Indeed, the friction coefficients and the energy relaxation rate diverge in this approximation since it does not properly account for the electronic screening of electron-ion interactions. The inclusion of screening effects considerably complicates the calculations. We discuss the physically-motivated approximations we applied to deal with these complications in order to investigate a widest range of materials and physical conditions.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.