Paper detail

Calculation of Bit Error Ratio for Optically Pre-Amplified DPSK Receivers Using Optical Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Demodulation and Balanced Detection

This paper presents an analysis of how to calculate bit error ratio (BER) with physical explanation for optically pre-amplified DPSK receivers using optical Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) demodulation and balanced detection. It is shown that BER calculation method for this kind of receivers is different from the conventional calculation method used widely for IM/DD receivers. An analytical relationship in receiver sensitivity between DPSK receivers using MZI demodulation with balanced detection and IM/DD receivers (or DPSK receivers using MZI demodulation and single-port detection) is given based on the Gaussian noise approximation. Our calculation method correctly predicts the 3-dB improvement of receiver sensitivity by using balanced detection over single-port detection or IM/DD receivers. Furthermore, quantum-limited DPSK receivers with MZI demodulation are also analyzed.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.