Paper detail

Calculation of binding energies and masses of quarkonia in analytic QCD models

We extract MSbar quark masses mqbar (q=b,c) from the evaluation of the masses of quarkonia Upsilon(1S) and J/ψ(1S), performed in two analytic QCD models, and in perturbative QCD in two renormalization schemes. In analytic QCD the running coupling has no unphysical singularities in the low-momentum regime. We apply the analytic model of Shirkov et al.[Analytic Perturbation Theory (APT)], extended by Bakulev et al.[Fractional Analytic Perturbation Theory (FAPT)], and the two-delta analytic model (2delanQCD). The latter, in contrast to (F)APT, at higher energies basically coincides with the perturbative QCD (in the same scheme). We use the renormalon-free mass mqbar as input. The separation of the soft and ultrasoft parts of the binding energy E is performed by the requirement of the cancellation of the leading infrared renormalon. The analysis in the 2delanQCD model indicates that the low-momentum ultrasoft regime is important for the extraction of the masses mqbar, especially mbbar. The 2delanQCD model gives us clues on how to estimate the influence of the ultrasoft sector on mqbar in general. These effects lead to relatively large values mbbar(mbbar) =approx (4.35 +- 0.08) GeV in the 2delanQCD model, which, however, are compatible with recent lattice calculations. In perturbative QCD in MSbar scheme these effects are even stronger and give larger uncertainties in mbbar. The (F)APT model gives small ultrasoft effects and the extracted values of mbbar agree with those in most of the literature: mbbar(mbbar) =approx 4.2 GeV. The extracted values of mcbar(mcbar) in all four models are about 1.26-1.27 GeV and agree well with those in the literature.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.