Paper detail

$C_6$ coefficients and dipole polarizabilities for all atoms and many ions in rows 1-6 of the periodic table

Using time-dependent density functional theory (tdDFT) with exchange kernels we calculate and test imaginary frequency-dependent dipole polarizabilities for all atoms and many ns in rows 1-6 of the periodic table. These are then integrated over frequency to produce $C_6$ coefficients. Results are presented under different models: straight tdDFT calculations using two different kernels, "benchmark" tdDFT calculations corrected by more accurate quantum chemical and experimental data, and "benchmark" tdDFT with frozen orbital anions. Parametrisations are presented for 411+ atoms and ions, allowing results to be easily used by other researchers. A curious relationship, $C_{6,XY}\propto [α_X(0)α_Y(0)]^{0.73}$ is found between $C_6$ coefficients and static polarizabilities $α(0)$. The relationship $C_{6,XY}=2C_{6,X}C_{6,Y}/[α_X/α_YC_{6,Y}+α_Y/α_XC_{6,X}]$ is tested and found to work well ($<5$\% errors) in about 80\% of cases, but can break down badly ($>30$\% errors) in a small fraction of cases.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.