Researcher profile

Tomas Bucko

Tomas Bucko contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

$C_6$ coefficients and dipole polarizabilities for all atoms and many ions in rows 1-6 of the periodic table

Using time-dependent density functional theory (tdDFT) with exchange kernels we calculate and test imaginary frequency-dependent dipole polarizabilities for all atoms and many ns in rows 1-6 of the periodic table. These are then integrated over frequency to produce $C_6$ coefficients. Results are presented under different models: straight tdDFT calculations using two different kernels, &#34;benchmark&#34; tdDFT calculations corrected by more accurate quantum chemical and experimental data, and &#34;benchmark&#34; tdDFT with frozen orbital anions. Parametrisations are presented for 411+ atoms and ions, allowing results to be easily used by other researchers. A curious relationship, $C_{6,XY}\propto [α_X(0)α_Y(0)]^{0.73}$ is found between $C_6$ coefficients and static polarizabilities $α(0)$. The relationship $C_{6,XY}=2C_{6,X}C_{6,Y}/[α_X/α_YC_{6,Y}+α_Y/α_XC_{6,X}]$ is tested and found to work well ($<5$\% errors) in about 80\% of cases, but can break down badly ($>30$\% errors) in a small fraction of cases.

preprint2014arXiv

A comment on &#34;Interlayer interactions in graphites&#34; [Chen et al., Sci. Rep. 3, 3046 (2013)]

Determining the material properties of layered systems like graphite and bigraphene from \emph{ab initio} calculations is very difficult. This is mostly due to the complex van der Waals forces which help bind the layers. Recently, Chen~\emph{et al.} [Chen et al., Sci. Rep. 3, 3046 (2013)] reported a novel approach for extracting geometry dependent energetic properties of general, layered graphitic systems from periodic graphite calculations on AA, AB and ABC graphite. Unfortunately, their analysis suffered from a number of technical and theoretical flaws which make their results unreliable for predicting energetic properties. We propose that their conclusions in this regard should be reassessed, or reanalysed using more appropriate van der Waals theory.