Paper detail

Byzantine Multi-Agent Optimization: Part I

We study Byzantine fault-tolerant distributed optimization of a sum of convex (cost) functions with real-valued scalar input/ouput. In particular, the goal is to optimize a global cost function $\frac{1}{|\mathcal{N}|}\sum_{i\in \mathcal{N}} h_i(x)$, where $\mathcal{N}$ is the set of non-faulty agents, and $h_i(x)$ is agent $i$'s local cost function, which is initially known only to agent $i$. In general, when some of the agents may be Byzantine faulty, the above goal is unachievable, because the identity of the faulty agents is not necessarily known to the non-faulty agents, and the faulty agents may behave arbitrarily. Since the above global cost function cannot be optimized exactly in presence of Byzantine agents, we define a weaker version of the problem. The goal for the weaker problem is to generate an output that is an optimum of a function formed as a convex combination of local cost functions of the non-faulty agents. More precisely, for some choice of weights $α_i$ for $i\in \mathcal{N}$ such that $α_i\geq 0$ and $\sum_{i\in \mathcal{N}}α_i=1$, the output must be an optimum of the cost function $\sum_{i\in \mathcal{N}} α_ih_i(x)$. Ideally, we would like $α_i=\frac{1}{|\mathcal{N}|}$ for all $i\in \mathcal{N}$ -- however, this cannot be guaranteed due to the presence of faulty agents. In fact, we show that the maximum achievable number of nonzero weights ($α_i$'s) is $|\mathcal{N}|-f$, where $f$ is the upper bound on the number of Byzantine agents. In addition, we present algorithms that ensure that at least $|\mathcal{N}|-f$ agents have weights that are bounded away from 0. We also propose a low-complexity suboptimal algorithm, which ensures that at least $\lceil \frac{n}{2}\rceil-ϕ$ agents have weights that are bounded away from 0, where $n$ is the total number of agents, and $ϕ$ ($ϕ\le f$) is the actual number of Byzantine agents.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.