Paper detail

Byzantine Lattice Agreement in Synchronous Systems

In this paper, we study the Byzantine lattice agreement problem in synchronous systems. The lattice agreement problem in crash failure model has been studied both in synchronous and asynchronous systems, which leads to the current best upper bound of $O(\log f)$ rounds in both systems. However, very few algorithmic results are known for the lattice agreement problem in Byzantine failure model. The paper [Nowak et al., DISC, 2019] first gives an algorithm for a variant of the lattice agreement problem on cycle-free lattices that tolerates up to $f < n/(h(X) + 1)$ Byzantine faults, where $n$ is the number of processes and $h(X)$ is the height of the input lattice $X$. The recent preprint by Di et al. studies this problem with a slightly modified validity condition in asynchronous systems. They present a $O(f)$ rounds algorithm by using the reliable broadcast primitive as a first step and following the similar algorithmic framework as the algorithms in crash failure model. In this paper, we propose three algorithms for the Byzantine lattice agreement problem in synchronous systems. The first algorithm takes $\min \{3h(X) + 6,6\sqrt{f} + 6\})$ rounds and $O(n^2 \min\{h(X), \sqrt{f}\})$ messages, where $h(X)$ is the height of the input lattice $X$, $n$ is the total number of processes. The second algorithm runs in $3\log n + 3$ rounds and takes $O(n^2 \log n)$ messages. The third algorithm takes $4 \log f + 3$ rounds and takes $O(n^2 \log f)$ messages. All algorithms can tolerate up to $f < \frac{n}{3}$ Byzantine failures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.