Paper detail

Bunk8s: Enabling Easy Integration Testing of Microservices in Kubernetes

Microservice architecture is the common choice for cloud applications these days since each individual microservice can be independently modified, replaced, and scaled. However, the complexity of microservice applications requires automated testing with a focus on the interactions between the services. While this is achievable with end-to-end tests, they are error-prone, brittle, expensive to write, time-consuming to run, and require the entire application to be deployed. Integration tests are an alternative to end-to-end tests since they have a smaller test scope and require the deployment of a significantly fewer number of services. The de-facto standard for deploying microservice applications in the cloud is containers with Kubernetes being the most widely used container orchestration platform. To support the integration testing of microservices in Kubernetes, several tools such as Octopus, Istio, and Jenkins exist. However, each of these tools either lack crucial functionality or lead to a substantial increase in the complexity and growth of the tool landscape when introduced into a project. To this end, we present \emph{Bunk8s}, a tool for integration testing of microservice applications in Kubernetes that overcomes the limitations of these existing tools. \emph{Bunk8s} is independent of the test framework used for writing integration tests, independent of the used CI/CD infrastructure, and supports test result publishing. A video demonstrating the functioning of our tool is available from \url{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8wbS25O4Bo}.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.