Paper detail

Building confidence in state-of-the-art ab initio calculations of the density virial coefficients of B and C of helium-4: Part 1. Indirect evaluation methods using the results of SPRIGT

In this work, we propose indirect evaluation methods to check the accuracy and the uncertainty of ab initio calculated virial coefficients. To this end, we have used single-pressure refractive-index gas thermometry (SPRIGT) to estimate the impact of the second density virial coefficient B of helium-4 on temperature measurements between 5 K to 25 K. Our results, in good agreement with values of B obtained from recent ab initio calculations by Czachorowski et al. [Phys. Rev. A 102, 042810 (2020)], suggest uncertainties u(B) estimated previously by other authors were too conservative. Concerning the value of the third density virial coefficient C of helium-4, calculated ab initio by Garberoglio et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 134, 134106 (2011)], our results suggest their uncertainty u(C) is between 1.5 and 10.2 times too high.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.