Paper detail

Bubble nuclei: single-particle versus Coulomb interaction effects

The detailed investigation of microscopic mechanisms leading to the formation of bubble structures in the nuclei has been performed in the framework of covariant density functional theory. The main emphasis of this study is on the role of single-particle degrees of freedom and Coulomb interaction. In general, the formation of bubbles lowers the Coulomb energy. However, in nuclei this trend is counteracted by the quantum nature of the single-particle states: only specific single-particle states with specific density profiles can be occupied with increasing proton and neutron numbers. A significant role of central classically forbidden region at the bottom of the wine bottle potentials in the formation of nuclear bubbles (via primarily the reduction of the densities of the $s$ states at $r=0$) has been revealed for the first time. Their formation also depends on the availability of low-$l$ single-particle states for occupation since single-particle densities represent the basic building blocks of total densities. Nucleonic potentials disfavor the occupation of such states in hyperheavy nuclei and this contributes to the formation of bubbles in such nuclei. Additivity rule for densities has been proposed for the first time. It was shown that the differences in the densities of bubble and flat density nuclei follow this rule in the $A\approx 40$ mass region and in superheavy nuclei with comparable accuracy. This strongly suggests the same mechanism of the formation of central depression in bubble nuclei of these two mass regions. Nuclear saturation mechanisms and self-consistency effects also affect the formation of bubble structures. The detailed analysis of different aspects of bubble physics strongly suggests that the formation of bubble structures in superheavy nuclei is dominated by single-particle effects.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.