Paper detail

Broadcasting on Random Directed Acyclic Graphs

We study a generalization of the well-known model of broadcasting on trees. Consider a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with a unique source vertex $X$, and suppose all other vertices have indegree $d\geq 2$. Let the vertices at distance $k$ from $X$ be called layer $k$. At layer $0$, $X$ is given a random bit. At layer $k\geq 1$, each vertex receives $d$ bits from its parents in layer $k-1$, which are transmitted along independent binary symmetric channel edges, and combines them using a $d$-ary Boolean processing function. The goal is to reconstruct $X$ with probability of error bounded away from $1/2$ using the values of all vertices at an arbitrarily deep layer. This question is closely related to models of reliable computation and storage, and information flow in biological networks. In this paper, we analyze randomly constructed DAGs, for which we show that broadcasting is only possible if the noise level is below a certain degree and function dependent critical threshold. For $d\geq 3$, and random DAGs with layer sizes $Ω(\log k)$ and majority processing functions, we identify the critical threshold. For $d=2$, we establish a similar result for NAND processing functions. We also prove a partial converse for odd $d\geq 3$ illustrating that the identified thresholds are impossible to improve by selecting different processing functions if the decoder is restricted to using a single vertex. Finally, for any noise level, we construct explicit DAGs (using expander graphs) with bounded degree and layer sizes $Θ(\log k)$ admitting reconstruction. In particular, we show that such DAGs can be generated in deterministic quasi-polynomial time or randomized polylogarithmic time in the depth. These results portray a doubly-exponential advantage for storing a bit in DAGs compared to trees, where $d=1$ but layer sizes must grow exponentially with depth in order to enable broadcasting.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.