Paper detail

Brightness and Orbital Motion Peculiarities of Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON): Comparison with Two Very Different Comets

To gain a greater insight into the impending evolution of the physical behavior of comet C/2012 S1, its light curve and orbital properties are compared with those for C/1962 C1 (Seki-Lines) and C/2002 O4 (Hoenig). All three are likely Oort Cloud comets. C/1962 C1 survived an encounter with the Sun at less than 7 Rsun, while C/2002 O4 disintegrated near perihelion at 0.78 AU from the Sun. Less than two months before its perihelion at 2.7 Rsun, C/2012 S1 has a light curve that is much closer to C/1962 C1 than C/2002 O4. It remains to be seen whether its motion is affected by nongravitational perturbations. As new data on C/2012 S1 keep coming in, its continuing comparison with the two comets will provide information on its health by updating and adjusting its status. Strengths and weaknesses of this approach for potential future applications will eventually be assessed.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.