BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Zdenek Sekanina

Zdenek Sekanina appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
astro-ph.EPphysics.hist-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

12works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Formation and Evolution of the Stream of SOHO Kreutz Sungrazers. I. History and Preliminary Investigations

The nearly continuous stream of miniature comets dominated by the Kreutz sungrazers has been an unexpected bonanza for cometary science initiated by the launch of the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) in 1995. Over the nearly 30 years since the time, no serious attempt has been made to formulate a self-consistent model for the formation and evolution of this stream of Kreutz comets -- the goal of the present two-part investigation. Part I describes historical highlights of the research that has been relevant to the problem of SOHO sungrazers (including the major contributions by Hubbard, Kreutz, and Marsden) and furnishes preliminaries of diagnostic value that are intended to facilitate, and provide critical information for, the work in Part II. Formerly noted issues, such as the high frequency of close pairs in the SOHO database, are proposed to be products of a broader process of swarming, seen in both the nodal longitude and time. I present examples of tight swarms revealed by high arrival rates of the SOHO Kreutz sungrazers, primarily from Population I.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Great Comet of 1106, a Chinese Comet of 1138, and Daylight Comets in late 363 As Key Objects in Computer Simulated History of Kreutz Sungrazer System

We present the results of our orbital computations in support of the recently proposed contact-binary model for the Kreutz sungrazer system (Sekanina 2021, 2022). We demonstrate that comet Ikeya-Seki (C/1965 S1) previously passed perihelion decades after the Great Comet of 1106 (X/1106 C1) and argue that, like the Great September Comet of 1882 (C/1882 R1), it evidently was a fragment of the comet recorded by the Chinese in September 1138. The 1106 sungrazer appears instead to have been the previous appearance of the Great March Comet of 1843 (C/1843 D1). With no momentum exchange involved, fragments of a Kreutz sungrazer breaking up tidally near perihelion are shown to end up in orbits with markedly different periods because their centers of mass are radially shifted by a few kilometers relative to the parent. The daylight comets of AD 363, recorded by a Roman historian, are accommodated in our computations as the first appearance of the Kreutz sungrazers after their bilobed progenitor's breakup. We link the 1843-1106-363 (Lobe I) and 1882-1138-363 (Lobe II) returns to perihelion by single nongravitational orbits and gravitationally with minor center-of-mass shifts acquired in fragmentation events. We also successfully model the motion of Aristotle's comet as the rotating progenitor that at aphelion split (at a few m/s) into the two lobes, the precursors of, respectively, the 1843 and 1882 sungrazers; and provide a 1963-1041-363 link for comet Pereyra (C/1963 R1). Material fatigue could contribute to sungrazers' fragmentation throughout the orbit, including aphelion. -- Continuing problems with the nongravitational law in orbit software are noted.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Unprecedented Daylight Display of Kreutz Sungrazers in AD 363?

In the context of the recently proposed contact-binary model (Sekanina 2021), I investigate the circumstances of the first perihelion passage of the Kreutz sungrazers in orbits with barycentric periods near 735 yr, following the initial near-aphelion splitting of the presumed progenitor, Aristotle's comet of 372 BC. Given favorable conditions at this breakup and at episodes of secondary fragmentation in its aftermath, the fragments should have arrived at their first perihelion nearly simultaneously, reminiscent of the anticipated outcome for the two-superfragment model's perihelion return of AD 356 (Sekanina & Chodas 2004). The relevant case of a swarm of Kreutz sungrazers is examined to appraise possible scientific ramifications of the brief remark by Ammianus Marcellinus, a Roman historian, that "in broad daylight comets were seen" in late AD 363, only seven years later. The tested scenario, which does not contradict Ammianus' narrative and is consistent with the contact-binary model, involves a set of ten sungrazers visible in the daytime, all reaching perihelion over a period of 4.6 days. As part of this work, I comment on the role of the rapidly developing, brilliant post-perihelion tail; revise the apparent magnitude typical for the first and last naked-eye sightings; compare the visibility conditions in full daylight, in twilight, and at night; and, for the first time, present circumstantial evidence that favors comet X/1106 C1 as the parent to C/1843 D1 rather than to C/1882 R1 and C/1965 S1.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Study of a Potential Relationship Between Two Long-Period Comets and Rapid Inward Drifting of Aphelion Due to Orbital-Cascade Resonance

We study a potential genetic relationship of comets C/1846 O1 and C/1973 D1, whose apparent orbital similarity was tested by Kresak (1982) only statistically, using the Southworth-Hawkins (1963) criterion D. Our orbit determination for C/1846 O1 shows its period was ~500 yr, ~30 times shorter than that of C/1973 D1. Formerly unrecognized, this incongruity makes the objects' common origin less likely. Long-term orbit integration suggests that, if related, the two comets would have to have separated far away from the Sun (probably ~700 AU) 21 millennia ago and, unlike C/1973 D1, C/1846 O1 would have to have been subjected to a complex orbital evolution. Given the chance of encountering Jupiter to ~0.6 AU some 400 days after perihelion, C/1846 O1 and C/1973 D1 may have been perturbed, during their return in the 15th millennium BCE, into orbits that were, respectively, smaller and larger than was the parent's, with a net difference of more than 0.002 (AU)^{-1} in 1/a. Whereas C/1973 D1 was on the way to its 1973 perihelion, C/1846 O1 should have been subjected to recurring encounters with Jupiter, during which the orbital period continued to shorten by integral multiples of the Jovian orbital period, a process called high-order orbital-cascade resonance. While the integrated perturbation effect of C/1846 O1 by Jupiter does not appear to reduce the comet's orbital period to below ~1200 yr by the mid-19th century, we find that orbital-cascade resonance offers an attractive mechanism for rapid inward drifting of aphelion especially among dynamically new comets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Disintegration of Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON) Shortly Before Perihelion: Evidence from Independent Data Sets

As an Oort Cloud object with a record small perihelion distance of 2.7 Rsun and discovered more than a year before its encounter with the Sun, comet C/2012 S1 is a subject of considerable scientific interest. Its activity along the orbit's inbound leg evolved through a series of cycles. Two remarkable events preserved in SOHO's and/or STEREO's near-perihelion images of its tail were an early massive production of gravel at heliocentric distances of up to ~100 AU, evidently by the annealing of amorphous water ice on and near the nucleus' surface; and, about a week before perihelion, a rapid series of powerful explosions, from the comet's interior, of water with dust at extremely high rates, causing precipitous fragmentation of the nucleus, shattering it into a vast number of sublimating boulders, and ending up, a few days later, with a major, sudden drop in gas emission. The disintegration of the comet was completed by about 3.5 hours before perihelion, at a heliocentric distance of 5.2 Rsun, when C/2012 S1 ceased to exist as an active comet. The orbital motion in this period of time was subjected to progressively increasing outgassing-driven perturbations. A comprehensive orbital analysis results in successfully fitting the comet's observed motion from 2011 to ~7 hours before perihelion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Pairs and Groups of Genetically Related Long-Period Comets and Probable Identity of the Mysterious Lick Object of 1921

We present the history of investigation of the dynamical properties of pairs and groups of genetically related long-period comets (other than the Kreutz sungrazing system). Members of a comet pair or group move in nearly identical orbits and their origin as fragments of a common parent comet is unquestionable. The only variable is the time of perihelion passage, which differs from member to member considerably due primarily to an orbital-momentum increment acquired during breakup. Meter-per-second separation velocities account for gaps of years or tens of years, thanks to the orbital periods of many millennia. The physical properties of individual members may not at all be alike, as illustrated by the trio of C/1988 A1, C/1996 Q1, and C/2015 F3. We exploit orbital similarity to examine whether the celebrated and as yet unidentified object, discovered from the Lick Observatory near the Sun at sunset on 1921 August 7, happened to be a member of such a pair and to track down the long-period comet to which it could be genetically related. Our search shows that the Lick object, which could not be a Kreutz sungrazer, was most probably a companion to comet C/1847 C1 (Hind), whose perihelion distance was ~9 R_sun and true orbital period approximately 8300 years. The gap of 74.4 years between their perihelion times is consistent with a separation velocity of ~1 m/s that set the fragments apart following the parent's breakup in a general proximity of perihelion during the previous return to the Sun in the 7th millennium BCE.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Strong Erosion-Driven Nongravitational Effects in Orbital Motions of the Kreutz Sungrazing System's Dwarf Comets

We investigate the relationships among the angular orbital elements --- the longitude of the ascending node, Omega, the inclination, i, and the argument of perihelion, omega --- of the Kreutz system's faint, dwarf sungrazers observed only with the SOHO/STEREO coronagraphs; their published orbits were derived using a parabolic, purely gravitational approximation. In a plot of i against Omega the bright Kreutz sungrazers (such as C/1843 D1, C/1882 R1, C/1963 R1, etc.) fit a curve of fixed apsidal orientation, whereas the dwarf members are distributed along a curve that makes with the apsidal curve an angle of 15 deg. The dwarf sungrazers' perihelion longitude is statistically invariable, but their perihelion latitude increases systematically with Omega. We find that this trend can be explained by a strong erosion-driven nongravitational acceleration normal to the orbit plane, confirmed for several test dwarf Kreutz sungrazers by orbital solutions with nongravitational terms incorporated directly in the equations of motion on a condition of fixed apsidal orientation. Proceeding in three steps, we first apply Marsden et al.'s standard formalism, solving for the normal acceleration only, and eventually relax additional constraints on the nongravitational law and the acceleration's radial and transverse components. The resulting nongravitational accelerations on the dwarf sungrazers exceed the maximum for catalogued comets in nearly-parabolic orbits by up to three orders of magnitude, topping in exceptional cases the Sun's gravitational acceleration! A mass-loss model suggests that the dwarf sungrazers' nuclei fragment copiously and their dimensions diminish rapidly near the Sun, implying the objects' imminent demise shortly before they reach perihelion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Was Comet C/1945 X1 (du Toit) a Dwarf, SOHO-Like Kreutz Sungrazer?

The goal of this investigation is to reinterpret and upgrade the astrometric and other data on comet C/1945 X1, the least prominent among the Kreutz system sungrazers discovered from the ground in the 20th century. The central issue is to appraise the pros and cons of a possibility that this object is --- despite its brightness reported at discovery --- a dwarf Kreutz sungrazer. We confirm Marsden's (1989) conclusion that C/1945 X1 has a common parent with C/1882 R1 and C/1965 S1, in line with the Sekanina-Chodas (2004) scenario of their origin in the framework of the Kreutz system's evolution. We integrate the orbit of C/1882 R1 back to the early 12th century and then forward to around 1945 to determine the nominal direction of the line of apsides and perform a Fourier analysis to get insight into effects of the indirect planetary perturbations. To better understand the nature of C/1945 X1, its orbital motion, fate, and role in the hierarchy of the Kreutz system as well as to attempt detecting the comet's possible terminal outburst shortly after perihelion and answer the question in the title of this investigation, we closely examined the relevant Boyden Observatory logbooks and identified both the photographs with the comet's known images and nearly 20 additional patrol plates, taken both before and after perihelion, on which the comet or traces of its debris will be searched for, once the process of their digitization, currently conducted as part of the Harvard College Observatory's DASCH Project, has been completed and the scanned copies made available to the scientific community.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Temporal Correlation Between Outbursts and Fragmentation Events of Comet 168P/Hergenrother

Outbursts are known to begin with a sudden appearance and steep brightening of a "stellar nucleus" --- an unresolved image of a plume of material on its way from the comet's surface and an initial stage of an expanding halo of ejecta. Since the brightness of this feature is routinely reported, together with astrometry, by most comet observers as the "nuclear magnitude," it is straightforward to determine the onset time, a fundamental parameter of any outburst, by inspecting the chronological lists of such observations for a major jump in the nuclear brightness. Although it is inadmissible to mix nuclear magnitudes by different observers without first carefully examining their compatibility, the time constraints obtained from data sets reported by different observers can readily be combined. The intersection of these sets provides the tightest possible constraint on the outburst's onset time. Applied to comet 168P/Hergenrother during its 2012 return to perihelion, three outbursts were detected and their timing determined with good to excellent accuracy. Six fragmentation events experienced by the comet are shown to have occurred in the same period of time as the outbursts. Three companions are likely to have broken off from the primary in the first outburst, two companions in the second outburst, and one companion in the last outburst. All companions were short-lived, belonging to the class of excessively brittle fragments. Yet, the results suggest that most of the mass lost in the first outburst remained relatively intact during the liftoff, while the opposite was the case in the last outburst.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Brightness and Orbital Motion Peculiarities of Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON): Comparison with Two Very Different Comets

To gain a greater insight into the impending evolution of the physical behavior of comet C/2012 S1, its light curve and orbital properties are compared with those for C/1962 C1 (Seki-Lines) and C/2002 O4 (Hoenig). All three are likely Oort Cloud comets. C/1962 C1 survived an encounter with the Sun at less than 7 Rsun, while C/2002 O4 disintegrated near perihelion at 0.78 AU from the Sun. Less than two months before its perihelion at 2.7 Rsun, C/2012 S1 has a light curve that is much closer to C/1962 C1 than C/2002 O4. It remains to be seen whether its motion is affected by nongravitational perturbations. As new data on C/2012 S1 keep coming in, its continuing comparison with the two comets will provide information on its health by updating and adjusting its status. Strengths and weaknesses of this approach for potential future applications will eventually be assessed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Population of SOHO/STEREO Kreutz Sungrazers and the Arrival of Comet C/2011 W3 (Lovejoy)

We examine properties of the population of SOHO/STEREO (dwarf) Kreutz sungrazing comets from 2004 to 2013, including the arrival rates, peculiar gaps, and a potential relationship to the spectacular comet C/2011 W3 (Lovejoy). Selection effects, influencing the observed distribution, are largely absent among bright dwarf sungrazers, whose temporal sequence implies the presence of a swarm, with the objects brighter at maximum than apparent magnitude 3 arriving at a peak rate of about 4.6 per year in late 2010, while those brighter than magnitude 2 at a peak rate of about 4.3 per year in early 2011, both a few times the pre-swarm rate. The entire population of SOHO/STEREO Kreutz sungrazers also peaked about one year before the appearance of C/2011 W3. Orbital data show, however, that all bright dwarf sungrazers moved in paths similar to that of comet C/1843 D1, deviating 10 deg or more from the orbit of C/2011 W3 in the angular elements. The evidence from the swarm and the overall elevated arrival rates suggests the existence of a fragmented sizable sungrazer that shortly preceded C/2011 W3 but was independent of it. On the other hand, these findings represent another warning signal that the expected 21st-century cluster of spectacular Kreutz comets is on its way to perihelion, to arrive during the coming decades. It is only in this sense that we find a parallel link between C/2011 W3 and the spikes in the population of SOHO/STEREO Kreutz sungrazers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Comet C/2011 W3 (Lovejoy): Orbit Determination, Outbursts, Disintegration of Nucleus, Dust-Tail Morphology, and Relationship to New Cluster of Bright Sungrazers

We describe the physical and orbital properties of C/2011 W3. After surviving perihelion, the comet underwent major changes (permanent loss of nuclear condensation, formation of spine tail). The process of disintegration culminated with an outburst on December 17.6 (T+1.6 d) and this delayed response is inconsistent with the rubble pile model. Probable cause was thermal stress from the heat pulse into the nucleus after perihelion, which could also produce fragmentation of sungrazers far from the Sun. The spine tail was a synchronic feature, made up of dust released at <30 m/s. Since the nucleus would have been located on the synchrone, we computed the astrometric positions of the missing nucleus as the coordinates of the points of intersection of the spine tail's axis with lines of forced orbital-period variation, derived from orbital solutions based on preperihelion astrometry from the ground. The resulting osculating orbital period was 698+/-2 years, which proves that C/2011 W3 is the first major member of the predicted new, 21st-century cluster of bright Kreutz-system sungrazers. The spine tail's tip contained dust 1-2 mm in diameter. The bizarre appearance of the dust tail in images taken hours after perihelion with coronagraphs on SOHO and STEREO is readily understood. The disconnection of the comet's head from the preperihelion tail and the apparent activity attenuation near perihelion are both caused by sublimation of all dust at heliocentric distances smaller than ~1.8 solar radii. The tail's brightness is strongly affected by forward scattering of sunlight by dust. The longest-imaged grains had a radiation-pressure parameter beta ~ 0.6, probably submicron-sized silicate grains. The place of C/2011 W3 within the hierarchy of the Kreutz system and its genealogy via a 14th century parent suggest that it is indirectly related to the celebrated sungrazer X/1106 C1.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access