Paper detail

Brief critical analysis of the Darwin-Fowler method

We present a brief numerical study of the Darwin-Fowler method applied to the analysis of the energy partition of essembles of bosons and fermions. We analyze the assertion of the existence of a "strong maximum" made in the original paper of Darwin and Fowler and other studies and show that although the presumed saddle point along the real axis of the grand canonical parameters may exist it cannot, in general, be characterized as "strong", in the sense of having much larger magnitude than the other points along the path of integration. We show that in some cases the saddle point is not even present and the various approximations of the method can be interpreted as a tricky reformulation of usual thermodynamic relations. The close connection of the method with the formalism of the Laplace transform may produce wrong results if the internal energy of the components of the ensemble is not large enough. Therefore, although useful in many applications the Darwin-Fowler method may not be suitable, in general, for a detailed microscopic analysis of the nuclear structure in connection with the Shell Model approach, as it is usually done in studies of the pre-equilibrium stage of nuclear reactions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.