Paper detail

Bridging and depletion mechanisms in colloid-colloid effective interactions: A reentrant phase diagram

A general class of nonadditive sticky-hard-sphere binary mixtures, where small and large spheres represent the solvent and the solute, respectively, is introduced. The solute-solute and solvent-solvent interactions are of hard-sphere type, while the solute-solvent interactions are of sticky-hard-sphere type with tunable degrees of size nonadditivity and stickiness. Two particular and complementary limits are studied using analytical and semi-analytical tools. The first case is characterized by zero nonadditivity, lending itself to a Percus-Yevick approximate solution from which the impact of stickiness on the spinodal curves and on the effective solute-solute potential is analyzed. In the opposite nonadditive case, the solvent-solvent diameter is zero and the model can then be reckoned as an extension of the well-known Asakura-Oosawa model with additional sticky solute-solvent interaction. This latter model has the property that its exact effective one-component problem involves only solute-solute pair potentials for size ratios such that a solvent particle fits inside the interstitial region of three touching solutes. In particular, we explicitly identify the three competing physical mechanisms (depletion, pulling, and bridging) giving rise to the effective interaction. Some remarks on the phase diagram of these two complementary models are also addressed through the use of the Noro-Frenkel criterion and a first-order perturbation analysis. Our findings suggest reentrance of the fluid-fluid instability as solvent density (in the first model) or adhesion (in the second model) is varied. Some perspectives in terms of the interpretation of recent experimental studies of microgels adsorbed onto large polystyrene particles are discussed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.