Paper detail

Breakdown Properties of the M-Estimators of Multivariate Scatter

The M-estimators of multivariate scatter are known to have breakdown points no greater than 1/(p+1), where p is the dimension of the data. In high dimension, the breakdown points are usually considered to be disappointingly low. This paper studies the breakdown problem in more detail. The exact breakdown points for the M-estimators of scatter are obtained and it is shown that their low values are primarily due to contamination restricted to some plane. If such "coplanar" contamination is not present, then there exists M-estimators which have breakdown points close to 1/2. The effect of coplanar contamination is further examined and is shown to be related to the singularity of the scatter matrix. Finally, the implications of the results of this paper on whether the low breakdown point is necessarily a bad feature and on multivariate outlier detection are briefly discussed. This paper is a reprint of an unpublished 1986 Rutgers Technical Report.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.