Paper detail

Bounds for Learning Lossless Source Coding

This paper asks a basic question: how much training is required to beat a universal source coder? Traditionally, there have been two types of source coders: fixed, optimum coders such as Huffman coders; and universal source coders, such as Lempel-Ziv The paper considers a third type of source coders: learned coders. These are coders that are trained on data of a particular type, and then used to encode new data of that type. This is a type of coder that has recently become very popular for (lossy) image and video coding. The paper consider two criteria for performance of learned coders: the average performance over training data, and a guaranteed performance over all training except for some error probability $P_e$. In both cases the coders are evaluated with respect to redundancy. The paper considers the IID binary case and binary Markov chains. In both cases it is shown that the amount of training data required is very moderate: to code sequences of length $l$ the amount of training data required to beat a universal source coder is $m=K\frac{l}{\log l}$, where the constant in front depends the case considered.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.