Paper detail

Bounding the Sensitivity of Polynomial Threshold Functions

We give the first non-trivial upper bounds on the average sensitivity and noise sensitivity of polynomial threshold functions. More specifically, for a Boolean function f on n variables equal to the sign of a real, multivariate polynomial of total degree d we prove 1) The average sensitivity of f is at most O(n^{1-1/(4d+6)}) (we also give a combinatorial proof of the bound O(n^{1-1/2^d}). 2) The noise sensitivity of f with noise rate δis at most O(δ^{1/(4d+6)}). Previously, only bounds for the linear case were known. Along the way we show new structural theorems about random restrictions of polynomial threshold functions obtained via hypercontractivity. These structural results may be of independent interest as they provide a generic template for transforming problems related to polynomial threshold functions defined on the Boolean hypercube to polynomial threshold functions defined in Gaussian space.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.