Paper detail

Bootstrap confidence intervals for isotonic estimators in a stereological problem

Let $\mathbf{X}=(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ be a spherically symmetric random vector of which only $(X_1,X_2)$ can be observed. We focus attention on estimating F, the distribution function of the squared radius $Z:=X_1^2+X_2^2+X_3^2$, from a random sample of $(X_1,X_2)$. Such a problem arises in astronomy where $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ denotes the three dimensional position of a star in a galaxy but we can only observe the projected stellar positions $(X_1,X_2)$. We consider isotonic estimators of F and derive their limit distributions. The results are nonstandard with a rate of convergence $\sqrt{n/{\log n}}$. The isotonized estimators of F have exactly half the limiting variance when compared to naive estimators, which do not incorporate the shape constraint. We consider the problem of constructing point-wise confidence intervals for F, state sufficient conditions for the consistency of a bootstrap procedure, and show that the conditions are met by the conventional bootstrap method (generating samples from the empirical distribution function).

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.