Paper detail

Boolean elements in the Bruhat order

We show that $w\in W$ is boolean if and only if it avoids a set of Billey-Postnikov patterns, which we describe explicitly. Our proof is based on an analysis of inversion sets, and it is in large part type-uniform. We also introduce the notion of linear pattern avoidance, and show that boolean elements are characterized by avoiding just the $3$ linear patterns $s_1 s_2 s_1 \in W(A_2)$, $s_2 s_1 s_3 s_2 \in W(A_3)$, and $s_2 s_1 s_3 s_4 s_2 \in W(D_4)$. We also consider the more general case of $k$-boolean Weyl group elements. We say that $w\in W$ is $k$-boolean if every reduced expression for $w$ contains at most $k$ copies of each generator. We show that the $2$-boolean elements of the symmetric group $S_n$ are characterized by avoiding the patterns $3421,4312,4321,$ and $456123$, and give a rational generating function for the number of $2$-boolean elements of $S_n$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.