Paper detail

Bond Percolation in Small-World Graphs with Power-Law Distribution

\emph{Full-bond percolation} with parameter $p$ is the process in which, given a graph, for every edge independently, we delete the edge with probability $1-p$. Bond percolation is motivated by problems in mathematical physics and it is studied in parallel computing and network science to understand the resilience of distributed systems to random link failure and the spread of information in networks through unreliable links. Full-bond percolation is also equivalent to the \emph{Reed-Frost process}, a network version of \emph{SIR} epidemic spreading, in which the graph represents contacts among people and $p$ corresponds to the probability that a contact between an infected person and a susceptible one causes a transmission of the infection. We consider \emph{one-dimensional power-law small-world graphs} with parameter $α$ obtained as the union of a cycle with additional long-range random edges: each pair of nodes $(u,v)$ at distance $L$ on the cycle is connected by a long-range edge $(u,v)$, with probability proportional to $1/L^α$. Our analysis determines three phases for the percolation subgraph $G_p$ of the small-world graph, depending on the value of $α$. 1) If $α< 1$, there is a $p<1$ such that, with high probability, there are $Ω(n)$ nodes that are reachable in $G_p$ from one another in $O(\log n)$ hops; 2) If $1 < α< 2$, there is a $p<1$ such that, with high probability, there are $Ω(n)$ nodes that are reachable in $G_p$ from one another in $\log^{O(1)}(n)$ hops; 3) If $α> 2$, for every $p<1$, with high probability all connected components of $G_p$ have size $O(\log n)$. The setting of full-bond percolation in finite graphs studied in this paper, which is the one that corresponds to the network SIR model of epidemic spreading, had not been analyzed before.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.