Paper detail

Bond percolation between $k$ separated points on a square lattice

We consider a percolation process in which $k$ points separated by a distance proportional to system size $L$ simultaneously connect together ($k>1$), or a single point at the center of a system connects to the boundary ($k=1$), through adjacent connected points of a single cluster. These processes yield new thresholds $\overline p_{ck}$ defined as the average value of $p$ at which the desired connections first occur. These thresholds are not sharp as the distribution of values of $p_{ck}$ for individual samples remains broad in the limit of $L \to \infty$. We study $\overline p_{ck}$ for bond percolation on the square lattice, and find that $\overline p_{ck}$ are above the normal percolation threshold $p_c = 1/2$ and represent specific supercritical states. The $\overline p_{ck}$ can be related to integrals over powers of the function $P_\infty(p)$ equal to the probability a point is connected to the infinite cluster; we find numerically from both direct simulations and from measurements of $P_\infty(p)$ on $L\times L$ systems that, for $L \to \infty$, $\overline p_{c1} = 0.51755(5)$, $\overline p_{c2} = 0.53219(5)$, $\overline p_{c3} = 0.54456(5)$, and $\overline p_{c4} = 0.55527(5).$ The percolation thresholds $\overline p_{ck}$ remain the same, even when the $k$ points are randomly selected within the lattice. We show that the finite-size corrections scale as $L^{-1/ν_k}$ where $ν_k = ν/(k β+1)$, with $β=5/36$ and $ν=4/3$ being the ordinary percolation critical exponents, so that $ν_1= 48/41$, $ν_2 = 24/23$, $ν_3 = 16/17$, $ν_4 = 6/7$, etc. We also study three-point correlations in the system, and show how for $p>p_c$, the correlation ratio goes to 1 (no net correlation) as $L \to \infty$, while at $p_c$ it reaches the known value of 1.022.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.