Paper detail

Blocking unions of arborescences

Given a digraph $D=(V,A)$ and a positive integer $k$, a subset $B\subseteq A$ is called a \textbf{$k$-union-arborescence}, if it is the disjoint union of $k$ spanning arborescences. When also arc-costs $c:A\to \mathbb{R}$ are given, minimizing the cost of a $k$-union-arborescence is well-known to be tractable. In this paper we take on the following problem: what is the minimum cardinality of a set of arcs the removal of which destroys every minimum $c$-cost $k$-union-arborescence. Actually, the more general weighted problem is also considered, that is, arc weights $w:A\to \mathbb{R}_+$ (unrelated to $c$) are also given, and the goal is to find a minimum weight set of arcs the removal of which destroys every minimum $c$-cost $k$-union-arborescence. An equivalent version of this problem is where the roots of the arborescences are fixed in advance. In an earlier paper [A. Bernáth and Gy. Pap, \emph{Blocking optimal arborescences}, Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, 2013] we solved this problem for $k=1$. This work reports on other partial results on the problem. We solve the case when both $c$ and $w$ are uniform -- that is, find a minimum size set of arcs that covers all $k$-union-arbosercences. Our algorithm runs in polynomial time for this problem. The solution uses a result of [M. Bárász, J. Becker, and A. Frank, \emph{An algorithm for source location in directed graphs}, Oper. Res. Lett. \textbf{33} (2005)] saying that the family of so-called insolid sets (sets with the property that every proper subset has a larger in-degree) satisfies the Helly-property, and thus can be (efficiently) represented as a subtree hypergraph. We also give an algorithm for the case when only $c$ is uniform but $w$ is not. This algorithm is only polynomial if $k$ is not part of the input.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.