Paper detail

Bitcoin: a new Proof-of-Work system with reduced variance

Proof-of-Work (PoW) is a popular consensus protocol used by Bitcoin since its inception. PoW has the well-known flaw of assigning all the reward to the single miner (or pool) that inserts the new block. This has the consequence of making the variance of the reward and thus the mining enterprise risk extremely high. To address this problem, Shi in 2016 proposed a theoretical algorithm that would substantially reduce the issue. We introduce a variant of Proof-of-Work that improves on Shi's idea and can be easily implemented in practice. In order to insert a block, the network must not find a single nonce, but must find a few of them. This small change allows for a fairer distribution of rewards and at the same time has the effect of regularizing the insertion time of blocks. This would facilitate the emergence of small pools or autonomous miners.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.