Paper detail

Biometric Quality: Review and Application to Face Recognition with FaceQnet

"The output of a computerised system can only be as accurate as the information entered into it." This rather trivial statement is the basis behind one of the driving concepts in biometric recognition: biometric quality. Quality is nowadays widely regarded as the number one factor responsible for the good or bad performance of automated biometric systems. It refers to the ability of a biometric sample to be used for recognition purposes and produce consistent, accurate, and reliable results. Such a subjective term is objectively estimated by the so-called biometric quality metrics. These algorithms play nowadays a pivotal role in the correct functioning of systems, providing feedback to the users and working as invaluable audit tools. In spite of their unanimously accepted relevance, some of the most used and deployed biometric characteristics are lacking behind in the development of these methods. This is the case of face recognition. After a gentle introduction to the general topic of biometric quality and a review of past efforts in face quality metrics, in the present work, we address the need for better face quality metrics by developing FaceQnet. FaceQnet is a novel open-source face quality assessment tool, inspired and powered by deep learning technology, which assigns a scalar quality measure to facial images, as prediction of their recognition accuracy. Two versions of FaceQnet have been thoroughly evaluated both in this work and also independently by NIST, showing the soundness of the approach and its competitiveness with respect to current state-of-the-art metrics. Even though our work is presented here particularly in the framework of face biometrics, the proposed methodology for building a fully automated quality metric can be very useful and easily adapted to other artificial intelligence tasks.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.